Importancia de la apropiada selección de aditamentos protésicos sobre implantes para conservar el estado de salud gingival: reporte de caso / Importance of the appropriate selection of prosthetic attachments on implants to preserve the state of gingival health: case report

Introducción: La rehabilitación oral en pacientes edéntulos parciales que requieren implantes dentales ha incrementado su demanda en los últimos años, convirtiéndose en un tratamiento de rutina, donde procedimientos quirúrgicos y protésicos tienen un éxito considerable. En algunos casos estas complicaciones se resuelven de forma simple, en otros, se necesita de una mejor planificación. Objetivo: Modificar y complementar el plan de tratamiento del paciente como solución definitiva al posicionamiento equivocado de los implantes dentales oseo integrados. Presentación del Caso: Paciente de 64 años, hombre, asistió a Centro de Atención Odontológica de la Universidad de Las Américas (CAO/UDLA), para terminar tratamiento odontológico de especialidad, rehabilitación de cuatro implantes colocados en zona 1.6 (Mis: C1 4.20 x 13mm); 1.4 (Mis: C1 3.75x11.50 mm); 1.2 (Mis: C1 3.75 x 11.50 mm); 2.1 (Mis: C1 4.20 x 11.50 mm), a examen clínico se pudo observar prótesis acrílica transicional inmediata desadaptada e inestable oclusalmente como resultado de proceso de cicatrización de tejidos, pérdida de piezas dentales postero-inferiores (3.6; 3.7; 4.6 y 4.7).La angulación equivocada de los implantes anteriores obligó la necesidad de corregirla mediante el uso de aditamentos rotacionales Multi-unit rectos de 2 mm altura en implantes 1.6; 1.4, aditamentos anti rotacionales tipo Multi-unit angulados de 1 mm de altura a 30º para los implantes 1.2 y 2.1 con healingcaps para proteger el aditamento de la acumulación de placa bacteriana y facilitar la higienización e inserción de la prótesis múltiple. Conclusiones: Los aditamentos colocados modificaron y complementaron la rehabilitación de los implantes incluso en la zona anterior donde se encontró tejido mucoso insuficiente que cubra de forma completa el aditamento elegido. (AU)

Introduction: Oral rehabilitation in partial edentulous patients who require dental implants has increased its demand in recent years, becoming a routine treatment, where surgical and prosthetic procedures have considerable success In some cases these complications are resolved simply, in others. Aims: Better planning is needed modify and complement the patient’s treatment plan as a definitive solution to the wrong positioning of osseointegrated dental implants. Presentation of the Case: Patient of 64 years, man, attended the Dental Care Center of the University of the Americas (CAO / UDLA), to finish specialty dental treatment, rehabilitation of four implants placed in zone 1.6 (Mis: C1 4.20 x 13mm); 1.4 (Mis: C1 3.75x11.50 mm); 1.2 (Mis: C1 3.75 x 11.50 mm); 2.1 (Mis: C1 4.20 x 11.50 mm), On clinical examination, immediate transitional acrylic prosthesis could be observed maladapted and occlusally unstable as a result of tissue healing process, loss of postero-inferior teeth (3.6; 3.7; 4.6 and 4.7). The wrong angulation of the previous implants forced the need to correct it through the use of 2 mm high straight Multi-unit rotational attachments in implants 1.6; 1.4, angled Multi-unit anti-rotational attachments from 1 mm high to 30 mm for implants 1.2 and 2.1 with healing caps to protect the attachment from the accumulation of bacterial plaque and facilitate the sanitization and insertion of the multiple prosthesis. Conclusions: The attachments placed modified and complemented the rehabilitation of the implants even in the anterior area where insufficient mucous tissue was found to completely cover the chosen attachment. (AU)

Zygomatic implants in intra-sinus versus extra-maxillary approaches for prosthetic rehabilitation in severely atrophic maxillae: finite element analysis / Implantes cigomáticos en abordajes intra sinusal versus extra maxilar para rehabilitación protésica en maxilares severamente atróficos: análisis de elementos finitos

Objetive: To compare the stresses and deformations generated on the surrounding bone of the zygomatic implants when using an intra sinusal and extra-maxillary approach, through the finite element method. Material and Methods: Computer aided designs (CADs) were constructed using SolidWorks Software of a skull with bone resorption to be rehabilitated through a fixed hybrid prosthesis using two zygomatic and two conventional straight implants. For the boundary conditions (load conditions), symmetry in the sagittal plane was assumed and that all the materials were isotropic, homogeneous and linearly elastic. Two zygomatic implantation techniques were simulated: intra sinusal (Is) and extra maxillary (Em). Vertical and lateral loads of 150 N and 50 N were applied to the finite element models to obtain Von Mises equivalent stress and strain (displacement). Results: The average measurement of the Von Mises stress (MPa) recorded were as follows: Approach of the implant body (Is: 0.24- Em: 0.28,) effort of implant body with vertical load: Is: 0.69 - Em: 0.96; effort of peri-implant surface under horizontal load: Is: 2.11 - Em: 0.94. Average displacement under vertical load of peri-implant surface Is: 0.35 - Em: 0.40, and of implant body Is: 1.34 - Em: 2.04. Average total deformation in approach Is: 2.23 mm - Em: 0.80mm, and average total deformation in the implant body under horizontal load was Is: 0.14 - Em: 0.21. Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that despite the differences that occurred in both stress and strain (displacement) between the intra-sinus and extra-maxillary approaches, the static strength of the bone, which is approximately 150 MPa in tension and 250 MPa in compression was not exceeded. Considering the limitations of finite element analysis, there seems to be no biomechanical reason to choose one approach over the other.

Objetivo: Comparar por el método de elementos finitos los esfuerzos y deformaciones generados sobre el hueso circundante de implantes cigomáticos tratados con un abordaje intra sinusal y extra maxilar. Material y Métodos: Se construyeron los diseños asistidos por computadora (CAD) utilizando el Software SolidWorks de un cráneo con una reabsorción ósea para ser rehabilitado, a través de una prótesis híbrida fija, mediante dos implantes cigomáticos y dos rectos convencionales. Para las condiciones de frontera (condiciones de carga) se asumió simetría en el plano sagital y que todos los materiales eran isotrópicos, homogéneos y linealmente elásticos. Se simularon dos técnicas de implantación cigomática: una intra sinusal (Is) y otra extra maxilar (Em). Se aplicaron cargas verticales y laterales de 150 N y 50 N a los modelos de elementos finitos para obtener el esfuerzo equivalente de Von mises y la deformación (desplazamiento). Resultados: La medición promedio del esfuerzo de Von Mises (MPa) registró: abordaje del cuerpo de implante (Is: 0.24-Em: 0.28) esfuerzo del cuerpo de implante con carga vertical: (Is:0.69 ­ Em: 0.96); esfuerzo de la superficie peri implantar ante carga horizontal (lateral):( Is:2.11 ­ Em:0.94). Desplazamiento promedio ante carga vertical de la superficie peri implantar (Is:0.35 ­ Em:0.40) y del cuerpo del implante (Is:1.34 ­ Em:2.04). Deformación total promedio en mm en abordaje (Is: 2.23 ­ Em:0.80) y deformación total promedio en el cuerpo del implante ante carga horizontal (Is:0.14 ­ Em:0.21). Conclusión: Los resultados de este estudio indican que a pesar de las diferencias que se presentaron tanto en el esfuerzo como en la deformación (desplazamiento) entre los abordajes intra sinusal y extra maxilar, la resistencia estática del hueso, que es de aproximadamente 150 MPa en tensión y 250 MPa en compresión no se superó. Considerando las limitaciones de los AEF, parece no haber razones biomecánicas para elegir uno u otro enfoque.

Sinus floor elevation using a new bovine bone grafting material: case report and bone grafting materials update / Actualización en materiales de relleno óseo: reporte de un caso clínico de elevamiento del piso del seno maxilar usando un nuevo material de relleno óseo bovino

Bone grafting is important to preserve the alveolar bone ridge height and volume for dental implant placement. Even though implant-supported overdentures present highly successful outcomes, it seems that a great number of edentulous individuals have not pursued implant-based rehabilitation. The cost of the treatment is one of the reasons of discrepancy between highly successful therapy and its acceptance. Therefore, the development of biomaterials for bone grafting with comparable characteristics and biological effects than those renowned internationally, is necessary. In addition, domestic manufacture would reduce the high costs in public health arising from the application of these biomaterials in the dental feld. The purpose of this clinical case report is to provide preliminary clinical evidence of the efficacy of a new bovine bone graft in the bone healing process when used for sinus floor elevation. (AU)

El uso de injertos óseos es importante para preservar la altura y el volumen de la cresta alveolar para la colocación de implantes dentales. Si bien las sobredentaduras implanto-soportadas presentan resultados altamente exitosos, la mayoría de las personas desdentadas no han sido rehabilitadas mediante implantes dentales. Uno de los principales motivos por los cuales los pacientes no aceptan este tipo de tratamiento, altamente exitoso, es el elevado costo del mismo. Por ello, es necesario el desarrollo de biomateriales de injerto óseo con características y efectos biológicos comparables a los reconocidos internacionalmente. Asimismo, la fabricación nacional reduciría los altos costos en Salud Pública derivados de la aplicación de estos biomateriales en el campo dental. El objetivo de esta comunicación es presentar un caso clínico a fin de proporcionar evidencia preliminar acerca de la eficacia de un nuevo injerto de hueso bovino en el proceso de cicatrización ósea en el levantamiento del piso del seno maxilar. (AU)

Prevalence of partial edentulism according to Kennedy and Applegate in patients treated at a university dental clinic in Lambayeque-Peru / Prevalencia de edentulismo parcial según Kennedy y Applegate en pacientes de la clínica odontológica de una universidad de Lambayeque-Perú

Introduction: Edentulism is an irreversible chronic condition that seriously affects the stomatognathic system. Consequently, determining its prevalence may contribute to prioritize preventive and rehabilitative oral health interventions. Objective: To determine the prevalence of partial edentulism according to the Kennedy and Applegate classification in patients attending the Dental Clinic at Universidad San Martín de Porres - Lambayeque Campus, Peru, in the years 2016 and 2017. Materials and methods: A descriptive, retrospective and cross-sectional study was designed. The study comprised 321 clinical records that previously underwent a quality control stage, which included a calibration process (k=0.86). The criteria and rules proposed by Kennedy and Applegate were applied to estimate the prevalence of edentulism in each jaw according to sex; tables of frequency distribution containing percentage results were used. Results: The highest prevalence of partial edentulism in the upper jaw corresponded to Class III (42.4%), followed by Class I (34.6%), and Class II (16.5%). In the lower jaw, the most prevalent were Class I (42.4%), Class III (36.4%), and Class II (15.6%). According to sex, Class III and Class I were the most prevalent in both females and males. Conclusion: Class III and I were the most prevalent in the upper jaw in both females and males; while in the lower jaw, Classes I and III were the most prevalent for both sexes.

El edentulismo se presenta como una alteración irreversible y crónica, que genera consecuencias en el sistema estomatognático, por lo cual es necesario conocer su prevalencia para priorizar intervenciones de salud bucal preventivas y de rehabilitación. Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia de edentulismo parcial según la clasificación de Kennedy y Applegate en pacientes atendidos en la Clínica Odontológica de la Universidad San Martín de Porres - Filial Lambayeque, en los años 2016 y 2017. Material y Método: Se diseñó un estudio descriptivo, retrospectivo y transversal, con 321 historias clínicas que pasaron previamente por un control de calidad que incluyó un proceso de calibración (k=0.86). Para estimar la prevalencia de edentulismo en cada maxilar y de acuerdo al género, fueron aplicados los criterios y reglas de kennedy y Applegate, utilizando tablas de distribución de frecuencias con resultados porcentuales. Resultados: La mayor prevalencia de edentulismo parcial para maxilar superior corresponde a la Clase III con 42,4%, siguiendo en orden descendente la Clase I con 34.6% y la Clase II con 16.5%. En el maxilar inferior, la más prevalente fue la Clase I con 42,4%, continuando la Clase III con 36.4% y la Clase II con 15.6%. De acuerdo a género, resultaron más prevalentes la Clase III y la Clase I tanto para mujeres como para hombres. Conclusiones: Las clases III y I fueron las más prevalentes en el maxilar superior, tanto para género masculino como femenino; mientras que en el maxilar inferior, fueron las clases I y III las más prevalentes también para ambos géneros.

Pragmatic care for an aging compromised dentition.

As our population ages, dentists face challenges in maintaining compromised teeth in aging patients. For the most part, elderly patients (i.e., over 65 years of age) prefer to keep their natural teeth and in some cases, avoid removable dentures altogether. Ideally, patients should not be rendered edentate late in life, as they are unlikely to successfully adapt to the limitations of complete replacement dentures. However, this is not always possible and care should ideally be planned to avoid edentulism, or at least, to carefully manage the transition to the edentate state. In the course of planning care, the dentist needs to recognise the need for age appropriate care, factoring in the impact of the elderly patient's health status and social circumstances. For elderly patients with a compromised dentition, the dentist should try to provide care which is minimally invasive and with as low a burden of maintenance as possible. In this paper, principles of pragmatic care for elderly patients with a compromised dentition will be outlined using clinical cases. Three pathways will be outlined: (i) maintenance of a functional natural dentition using adhesive restorative techniques; (ii) use of overlay prostheses and complete replacement overdentures to manage toothwear and toothloss, complete replacement overdentures, and; (iii) staging a transition to the edentate state using transitional removable partial dentures.

Complex Dental Implant Cases: Algorithms, Subjectivity, and Patient Cases Along the Complexity Continuum.

Algorithms for predictable outcomes, or checklists in health care, have been widely supported due to their highly effective outcomes. This article shares "algorithmic roadmaps" to restore single-tooth, partially edentulous, and fully edentulous complex dental implant cases in the patient population. A review of the current literature is presented to provide systematic assessments followed by criteria in a checklist format that allows the surgeon and restorative dentist to determine whether a removable or fixed implant prosthesis is the best patient option. Several cases have been chosen to illustrate the algorithms the authors used to provide an optimized prognosis for surgical/restorative success.

Clinical Concerns Regarding Dentition and Connections to Osseointegrated Implants: A Systematic Review of Implant Restoration Trends and Treatment of Partial Edentulism.

Issues associated with missing teeth can be found in almost all age groups. For edentulous patients, osseointegration is a highly efficient treatment. However, certain biochemical challenges are presented when osseointegrated implants are taken into consideration due to the periodontal ligament. Therefore, the current study focuses on clinical concerns that can occur with the use of dental implants and examines different trends of implant restoration and treatment of partial edentulous patients. Data were collected from ten research articles and analyzed by means of a qualitative secondary approach. The findings of the current study indicate that restoration and preservation of natural teeth are significant in the development of dental practices. Moreover, the determinant of endodontic treatment is considered to be a key factor in the retention and reconstruction of tooth functioning that is influenced by necrosis of dental pulp. We conclude that the osseointegration method is significant and highly effective for treating edentulous patients.

Outcomes of maxillary sinus floor augmentation without grafts in atrophic maxilla: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Maxillary sinus floor augmentation without grafts has been more widely used, but the efficacy is still controversial. PURPOSE: The aim of this review was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of sinus floor augmentation without grafts in atrophic maxilla. METHODS: The electronic databases included PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The meta-analysis was conducted by Review Manager 5.1. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: The electronic database and manual search yield 707 studies. After critical selection, only 6 studies were eligible. Five studies with 336 implants were included in the meta-analysis compared sinus augmentation with grafts to without grafts. No significant differences were found between the two groups in implant survivals (P = 0.94), marginal bone loss (P = 0.73) and new bone density (P = 0.54). There was significantly more endosinus bone gain in the grafting group (P = 0.02). According to the GRADE, the levels of evidence were moderate (implant survival and marginal bone loss), low (endosinus bone gain) and very low (new bone density). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences between maxillary sinus augmentation with and without grafts in short-term implant survivals.

Undesirable course of an oral implant rehabilitation in a patient with a long history of bulimia nervosa: case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Bulimia nervosa is an eating disorder resulting in an intended weight loss due to decreased food intake, induced vomiting, or hyperactivity, and is observed frequently between 12 and 25 years of age. One of the complications is early tooth loss. Moreover, since bulimia nervosa patients suffer from increased atrophy of the alveolar processes, oral rehabilitation even with short dental implants may be impossible. In these cases, lateralization or transposition of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) followed by implant placement can be useful. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old woman with a long-lasting history of bulimia nervosa requested a fixed rehabilitation of her partially edentulous mandible. In 2012, a bilateral IAN transposition approach was performed using piezosurgery, and without any postoperative neurosensory alterations. Two years later, bilateral insertion of each two implants was followed by an inflammatory destabilization of the lower left mandible; subsequent to the implant removal, a fracture occurred, and the latter was stabilized by osteosynthesis plates. In 2017, three additional implants were placed, finally providing the patient with a fixed restoration on five implants. CONCLUSION: Eating disorders may have a tremendous impact on both physical condition and oral health, resulting in early tooth loss and severe bone atrophy. IAN transposition is a viable treatment option to enable installing fixed prostheses via dental implants, but the latter will clearly increase the risk of inflammation and interruption of mandibular continuity. Close clinical and radiologic monitoring is mandatory to adequately respond to complications such as peri-implant mucositis, peri-implantitis, osteomyelitis, or concomitant fractures.

Measuring the space required for symmetrical prosthetic restorations in the esthetic zone for an orthodontic patient: A dental technique.

This article describes a technique for measuring the length of the edentulous space to be restored and transferring the same size of the dentate space on the contralateral side to plan for symmetrical definitive restorations for the restorative dentist and orthodontist. The technique involves incorporating 2 archwire locks with hooks on a stainless steel wire that can be easily moved and adjusted to assess the curved space being measured.

A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth edentulous area: 3-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, dental implants have been made from titanium or titanium alloys. Alternatively, zirconia-based ceramic implants have been developed with similar characteristics of functional strength and osseointegration. Ceramic implants offer advantages in certain settings, e.g. in patients who object to metal dental implants. The aim of this study was to investigate the mid-term (36 months) clinical performance of a ceramic monotype implant in single-tooth edentulous area. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm study in patients requiring implant rehabilitation in single-tooth edentulous area. Ceramic implants (PURE Ceramic Implant, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) with a diameter of 4.1 mm were placed following standard procedure and loaded with provisional and final prostheses after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Implant survival rate and implant success rate were evaluated and crestal bone levels were measured by analysing standardized radiographs during implant surgery and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. RESULTS: Forty-four patients received a study implant, of whom one patient withdrew consent after 3 months. With one implant lost during the first 6 months after surgery, the implant survival rate was 97.7% at 6 months. No further implants were lost over the following 30 months, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up during this time frame. This led to a survival rate of 97.5% at 36 months. Six months after implant surgery 93.0% of the implants were considered "successful", increasing to 97.6% at 12 months and remaining at this level at 24 months (95.1%) and 36 months (97.5%). Bone loss was most pronounced in the first half-year after implant surgery (0.88 ± 0.86 mm). By contrast, between 12 and 36 months the mean bone level remained stable (minimal gain of 0.06 [± 0.60] mm). Hence, the overall bone loss from implant surgery to 36 months was 0.97 (± 0.88) mm. CONCLUSIONS: In the follow-up period ceramic implants can achieve favourable clinical outcomes on a par with titanium implants. For instance, these implants can be recommended for patients who object to metal dental implants. However, longer term studies with different edentulous morphology need to confirm the present data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov : NCT02163395 .

Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of Working Group 1 was to address the influence of different local (implant length, diameter, and design) and systemic (medications) factors on clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes in implant dentistry. Focused questions on (a) short posterior dental implants (≤6 mm), (b) narrow diameter implants, (c) implant design (tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design), and (d) medication-related dental implant failures were addressed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four systematic reviews were prepared in advance of the Consensus Conference and were discussed among the participants of Group 1. Consensus statements, clinical recommendations, and recommendations for future research were based on structured group discussions until consensus was reached among the entire expert Group 1. The statements were then presented and accepted following further discussion and modifications as required by the plenary. RESULTS: Short implants (≤6 mm) revealed a survival rate ranging from 86.7% to 100%, whereas standard implant survival rate ranged from 95% to 100% with a follow-up from 1 to 5 years. Short implants demonstrated a higher variability and a higher Risk Ratio [RR: 1.24 (95% CI: 0.63, 2.44, p = 0.54)] for failure compared to standard implants. Narrow diameter implants (NDI) have been classified into three categories: Category 1: Implants with a diameter of <2.5 mm ("Mini-implants"); Category 2: Implants with a diameter of 2.5 mm to <3.3 mm; Category 3: Implants with a diameter of 3.3 mm to 3.5 mm. Mean survival rates were 94.7 ± 5%, 97.3 ± 5% and 97.7 ± 2.3% for category 1, 2 and 3. Tapered versus non-tapered implants demonstrated only insignificant differences regarding clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. The intake of certain selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors is associated with a statistically significant increased implant failure rate. The intake of bisphosphonates related to the treatment of osteoporosis was not associated with an increased implant failure rate. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that short implants (≤6 mm) are a valid option in situations of reduced bone height to avoid possible morbidity associated with augmentation procedures; however, they reveal a higher variability and lower predictability in survival rates. Narrow diameter implants with diameters of 2.5 mm and more demonstrated no difference in implant survival rates compared to standard diameter implants. In contrast, it is concluded that narrow diameter implants with diameters of less than 2.5 mm exhibited lower survival rates compared to standard diameter implants. It is further concluded that there are no differences between tapered versus non-tapered dental implants. Certain medications such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and proton pump inhibitors showed an association with a higher implant failure rate.

Systematic review of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following oral rehabilitation on dental implants with a tapered compared to a non-tapered implant design.

BACKGROUND: Dental implants are available in different shapes. AIMS: This systematic review aims to address whether tapered compared to non-tapered implants demonstrate similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes. The review follows the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) format. MATERIALS & METHODS: We searched electronic databases including MEDLINE through PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized clinical trials (RCT) that compare tapered versus non-tapered implants with at least 10 treated participants and a minimum mean follow-up time of 3 years. There were no restrictions to a particular treatment indication or outcome measures. Two authors independently conducted screening, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction of eligible trials in duplicate. We applied the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool to consider risk of bias. RESULTS: We identified 18 different RCTs, of which three reported outcomes at 3 years or greater. The three trials described the results of 245 participants with 388 implants at 3 years, from the initially 306 participants with 494 implants at baseline. The three trials compared, respectively, two, two, and three different commercially available implant brands and reported only clinically insignificant differences. We judged all three trials to be at moderate risk of bias. The low number and heterogeneity of RCTs did not allow for meta-analyses. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Appropriate professional judgment in clinical decision making must include a comprehensive diagnosis of the patient's jawbone quality and quantity and consideration of osteotomy protocol in accordance with the patient's treatment preferences, where the shape of the dental implant is only one contributory factor.

Implant Treatment after Sagittal Splitting Ramus Osteotomy and Alveolar Ridge Augmentation in Patient with Mandibular Prognathism and Multiple Missing Maxillary Teeth.

An abnormal maxillomandibular ridge relationship frequently hinders oral implant treatment in patients with jaw deformities. Here, we describe a patient who was experiencing difficulty using dentures due to multiple maxillary tooth loss and mandibular prognathism. Treatment comprising sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy and alveolar ridge augmentation using bone grafts harvested from the mandibular ramus followed by implant treatment yielded good outcomes. The patient was a 47-year-old woman presenting with an unstable upper partial denture. Although prior prosthetic treatment for mandibular prognathism had resulted in normal overbite, she had since lost an increasing number of teeth due to advanced periodontal disease, impairing support for the denture. She was referred to the Department of Oral Implantology at the Tokyo Dental College Chiba Hospital in October 2008. Subsequent treatment comprised implant treatment following maxillary alveolar ridge augmentation and sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy to correct the maxillary-mandibular relationship. In January 2010, sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy and alveolar bone augmentation using a bone graft from the mandibular ramus were performed under general anesthesia. In July and August 2010, a total of 7 implants were placed in the maxilla and implant superstructure preparation started after 3 months. Taking both the patient's wishes and ease of maintenance into account, retrievable superstructures made of Auro Galvano Crown were fitted in April 2011. The jaw-to-jaw alveolar ridge relationship was improved by sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy, rendering subsequent treatment, from implant placement to superstructure preparation, feasible by conventional methods. The use of surplus bone generated during sagittal splitting ramus osteotomy for bone augmentation avoided the need to harvest bone from another area.

A Case History Report on Use of Orthodontic Intrusion in a Partially Edentulous Patient.

This case history report highlights the possibilities and limitations of orthodontic molar intrusion using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in the prosthodontic management of patients with compromised interarch distance.

Implant prosthetic rehabilitation in partially edentulous patients with bone atrophy. An umbrella review based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.

PURPOSE: To summarise systematic reviews that assess the effects of different interventions for implant prosthetic rehabilitation in partially edentulous patients with the presence of bone atrophy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Only systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with partially edentulous adult patients presenting bone defects were included. Treatments of interest were bone augmentation procedures, use of short, tilted or zygomatic implants, sinus lift and transposition of the inferior alveolar nerve. Outcome variables considered were: prosthetic and implant failure, complications, radiological and clinical peri-implant bone level variation, aesthetic and functional satisfaction, and vestibular peri-implant soft tissue recession. A search of systematic reviews of RCTs selected from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, and the Prospero register published in the past 5 years (May 2012 - May 2017) was performed. Systematic reviews were also manually searched. Independent data extraction by two authors using predefined data fields, including ROBIS risk of bias, was executed. RESULTS: A total of 12 systematic reviews of RCTs were identified for inclusion in the overview. Eight reviews were considered at low risk of bias. Short implants (≤ 8 mm) were associated with a notable decrease in complications compared to long implants with bone augmentation procedures. Many trials compared different sinus lift procedures and different bone augmentation techniques. None of these indicated that one procedure could reduce prosthetic or implant failures when compared to the other. The use of a membrane can contribute to the regeneration of the hard tissue in horizontal augmentation. Different membranes or bone substitutes did not give substantially different results. No data are available regarding comparisons involving zygomatic implants or tilted implants or transposition of the alveolar nerve. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the evidence is not sufficiently robust to determine the best treatment for implant prosthetic rehabilitation in partially edentulous patients presenting bone atrophy. In terms of vertical defects, if the short implants can be used they should be used because the number of complications are reduced compared to longer implants with sinus lift or bone augmentation. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised because long-term follow-up studies were not available. No conclusions can be drawn regarding the comparison between different vertical bone augmentation techniques in atrophic posterior mandible because quantitative meta-analyses were not performed. With regards to horizontal defects, the use of a membrane appears to increase the regeneration of the hard tissue but no differences were detected in prosthesis or implant failures or in complications.

The challenge of managing patients with generalized short root anomaly: A case report.

The case of an 18-year-old woman with generalized short root anomaly (SRA) is presented, and the clinical management and challenges associated with this rare condition are discussed. The patient was referred for restoration of the edentulous maxillary left anterior region. Due to the SRA, the patient had previously received limited orthodontic treatment for the ectopic maxillary canines. The maxillary left canine failed during orthodontic traction, the left lateral incisor migrated in its region and had poor prognosis due to severe mobility. Therefore, it was extracted and the region was restored with an implant-supported cantilever metal-ceramic fixed partial denture. Radiographic examination revealed generalized SRA along with other dental anomalies. From the patient's family history, as well as from the physical, clinical, radiographic, biochemical, and histologic evaluations, we were unable to identify the etiology behind this unique combination of dental anomalies. Esthetics and function were successfully restored and a strict recall system was implemented in order to monitor and maintain the short-rooted teeth. The need to prevent tooth and periodontal tissue deterioration in patients with generalized short roots is emphasized.

Prosthetic, orthodontic and implant-supported rehabilitation of five maxillary anterior teeth with alveolar bone loss.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of maxillofacial injuries is complex and requires the establishment of a comprehensive and accurate diagnosis and correct treatment planning. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this case report was to describe the re-treatment of a 27-year-old woman who was involved in a severe car accident that resulted in the loss of five anterior teeth and alveolar bone, and whose previous orthodontic and surgical treatments had been unsuccessful. CASE REPORT: In this case, the space for the missing mandibular molar was reopened to allow for rehabilitation. The positions of the mandibular incisors were improved. The right mandibular canine was moved to the mesial, allowing for correction of the Class II canine relationship on that side, and implants were placed to replace the maxillary anterior teeth. CONCLUSION: Anterior aesthetic and functional rehabilitation using a multidisciplinary approach was essential to improve the patient's facial aesthetics, to obtain great improvement in function and to achieve occlusal stability after 2 years of follow-up.

Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 × 5 mm implants with a nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 5.0 × 5.0 mm dental implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface could be an alternative to implants of at least 10.0 mm long placed in bone augmented with bone substitutes in posterior atrophic jaws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with atrophic posterior (premolar and molar areas) mandibles with 5.0 mm to 7.0 mm bone height above the mandibular canal, and 40 patients with atrophic maxillas with 4.0 mm to 6.0 mm below the maxillary sinus, were randomised according to a parallel group design to receive between one and three 5.0 mm implants or one to three at least 10.0 mm-long implants in augmented bone at two centres. All implants had a diameter of 5.0 mm. Mandibles were vertically augmented with interpositional bovine bone blocks covered with resorbable barriers. Implants were placed after 4 months. Maxillary sinuses were augmented with particulated porcine bone via a lateral window covered with resorbable barriers, and implants were placed simultaneously. All implants were submerged and loaded after 4 months with provisional prostheses. Four months later, definitive screw-retained or provisionally cement metal-ceramic or zirconia prostheses were delivered. Patients were followed to 3 years post-loading and the outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures, any complication, and peri-implant marginal bone level changes. RESULTS: Seven patients dropped out before the 3-year evaluation (two short mandibles, one short maxilla, two augmented mandibles and two augmented maxillae). In mandibles, two grafted patients were not prosthetically rehabilitated because of multiple complications and two implants failed in the same patient (the second was a replacement implant) vs one patient who lost a short implant and crown 2 years after loading. In maxillas one short implant failed with its provisional crown 3 months post-loading. There were no statistically significant differences in prostheses (difference in proportion = 0.001; 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.13; P = 1.000) and implant failures (difference in proportion = 0.00; 95% CI: -0.13 to 0.13; P = 1.000) up to 3 years after loading. Significantly, more complications occurred at mandibular grafted sites: 17 augmented patients were affected by complications vs eight patients treated with short implants in mandibles (difference in proportion = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.64; P = 0.008). In the maxilla, six sinus-lifted patients vs two patients treated with short implants were affected by complications; the difference not being statistically significant (difference in proportion = 0.21; 95% CI: -0.05 to 0.45; P = 0.232). Patients with mandibular short implants lost on average 1.10 mm of peri-implant bone at 3 years and patients with 10.0 mm or longer mandibular implants lost 1.39 mm. Patients with maxillary short implants lost on average 1.04 mm of peri-implant bone at 3 years and patients with 10 mm or longer maxillary implants lost 1.43 mm. Longer implants showed a greater bone loss up to 3 years after loading than short implants both in maxillae (mean difference: -0.39 mm; 95% CI: -0.70 to -0.07 mm; P = 0.017) and in mandibles (mean difference: -0.29 mm; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.05 mm; P = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: Three years after loading, 5.0 mm × 5.0 mm implants achieved similar results than longer implants placed in augmented bone. Short implants might be a preferable choice to bone augmentation especially in posterior mandibles since the treatment is faster, cheaper and associated with less morbidity. However, 5- to 10-year post-loading data are necessary before making reliable recommendations.